
Last Tuesday's panel discussion New Media, New Politics: Jane Jacobs and an Activist Press brought together contrasting opinions on the future of the news media. Moderated by Sewell Chan of The New York Times, the panel, including Alberto Vourvoulias-Bush of El Diario, Jane Hamsher of firedoglake.com, Norman Oder of atlanticyardsreport.com and author Gay Talese, debated the state of contemporary journalism -- bad, too few journalists; the role and value of the blogosphere -- useful in plugging the gaps in the conventional media's coverage, lazy journalism; the future of online journalism -- likely to increase at the expense of paper-based forms, bridging the economic, social and linguistic "digital-divide"; and how today's activists can make use of new media -- focus of much of dissent that isn't covered by mainstream press.
In true reflexive, post-modern, new media fashion, the panel received a variety of coverage in the press, mostly from the panelists themselves:
- The New York Times, Panel Discussion: New Media, Old Media and Advocacy, Sewell Chan blogs about the program.
- AtlanticYardsReport, The Activist Press and the Atlantic Yards Narrative, Norman Oder discusses the panel and the lack of big paper journalists covering Brooklyn, especially the Atlantic Yards project.
- firedoglake.com, Battle For the Heart of the Democratic Party, Jane Hamsher points out that the panel covered the issue of contemporary dissent in America.
To watch a short video podcast of the event, click here or here.
Comments
(Post new comment)Do I really want more big
Posted by Norman OderThursday, October 25, 2007, 03:09pm
Do I really want more big newspaper journalists covering Brooklyn? Sure, there's work for all of us. In fact, there's so much to cover that even a doubling in size of the dailies' Brooklyn bureaus probably wouldn't mean anyone would emerge as an expert on Atlantic Yards.
As for putting me "out of a job," well, I'm not paid for my blog and paid a pittance for my contributions to the Brooklyn Downtown Star.
reading
Posted by Norman OderFriday, October 19, 2007, 03:21pm
FWIW, I wrote out my remarks and then rewrote them to try to approximate my speech patterns. So yes, I relied on a script--I wanted to ensure that I maximized the six minutes I had for my main presentation. But I wasn't reading a paper written for the eye.
Oder reading
Posted by bbfunktTuesday, October 23, 2007, 02:54pm
thanks for clearing that up Norman - i hadn't realized how tightly controlled the time was. I'm curious though, do you really want more big newspaper journalists covering brooklyn as you say in the video, or, since you have found a niche in their absence, would it put you out of a job?
yeah, i know! what the hell?
Posted by Jamin the FuturistTuesday, October 16, 2007, 04:28pm
yeah, i know! what the hell?
hey, did you go to the event? On the video it looks like Norman Oder is reading a script. did he really do that?
does look like he's reading
Posted by bbfunktTuesday, October 16, 2007, 05:49pm
no, i couldn't make it, but you're right it does look like he's reading. weird. really like his blog though and liked the way he described the atlantic yards narrative in the video.
i wonder why Sewell Chan didn't say more about the Times?
what a dinosaur! i'm sorry,
Posted by Jamin the FuturistTuesday, October 16, 2007, 02:33pm
what a dinosaur! i'm sorry, but Talese is a dinosaur! no disrespect to him, and great to have him on the panel for a difference of opinion, but he showed his age with some of those comments about dissent in modern America!!
out of touch
Posted by bbfunktTuesday, October 16, 2007, 02:40pm
seriously, Jamin. Talese's a great writer but "let's all go to blog and fall in love" - what?
by the way, great podcast!
Post new comment