gentrification

Gentrification vs. Diversity: the Video

At the final Jane Jacobs and the Future of New York panel on Tuesday, December 4, moderator Matt Schuerman and panelists Calvin Butts, Michelle de la Uz, Ron Shiffman and Errol Louis discuss the often antagonistic relationship between neighborhood improvement, gentrification and displacement.

Watch the video and tell us whether you think there are solutions to the loss of diversity that follows neighborhood gentrification the panelists identify.

Final Jacobs Panel Ponders CBAs and Whether Gentrification and Diversity Can Co-Exist

Last night, at the final Jane Jacobs and the Future of New York panel discussion, Errol Louis, Ron Shiffman, Michelle de la Uz and Calvin Butts discussed the changing nature of neighborhood character as the city develops, grows and gentrifies at an ever-increasing rate.

The panel discussion, titled The Oversuccessful City, part 2: Neighborhood Character in the Face of Change, was intended to focus on the fact that, as more and more communities around the city are finding, achieving the careful balance that defines a great urban neighborhood can imperil indigenous communities, both physically and socially.

Rev. Butts, after describing the work of the Abyssinian Church in Harlem, beginning in the 1970s, to encourage the creation of better housing, better schools and to attract businesses to a neighborhood that lacked basic services like grocery stores, wondered how, once these things had been achieved, a balance can be created that allows a lively, diverse neighborhood to remain intact without it being overrun by rich people who displace the indigenous population.

Several of the panelists ventured that many of the problems with gentrification, including displacement, might be mitigated if the city planning department had legislation on inclusionary zoning and affordable housing at their disposal to mandate certain provisions from real estate developers.

The specter of community-benefits agreements was also raised, with some panelists suggesting that they might be model for future development, and others saying that the existence of CBAs was symptomatic of the failure of the public planning process.

Listen to the Discussion
To listen to the panel discussion in full, click here. And for further analysis of the program from AtlanticYardsReport.com, click here. read more...

MTA Riders Pay More Than Other US Cities, But Is the Subway Still a Bargain?

MTA fare hikes came under scrutiny again in the press yesterday over a report detailing that New Yorkers pay for a higher percentage of their mass transit through fares than any other city in the nation. An article in the NY Daily News, titled New Yorkers taken for a ride with transit costs - report, called it unfair that city residents pay a greater proportion of the costs of mass transit than any other city in nation. The News began a campaign last week called "Halt the Hike" urging state officials not to go ahead and increase subway fares by 25c in March of '08.

While MTA officials admit that the agency is set to make a $400million surplus this year, they claim increased fares are needed to offset increased costs in the fiscal year 2009 that will also eat up much of the surplus. Governor Spitzer has declared fare hikes a "last resort", and many local elected officials have also come out against them. However, there are two different issues here -- one, that fare hikes are necessary or unnecessary to balance the state purse, and two, whether New Yorkers are paying too much for their mass transit. read more...